SeaweedFS vs Garage vs MinIO
All three speak S3, but they are built for different jobs. SeaweedFS is a Haystack-style file store for billions of small files with FUSE and pluggable metadata, Garage is a small Rust cluster designed for geo-distributed nodes that fail, and MinIO is an erasure-coded Go object store whose repository is now archived.
- SeaweedFS
- Go · Apache-2.0
- Garage
- Rust · AGPL-3.0
- MinIO
- Go · AGPL-3.0
- Updated
- 2026-09-25
Which one should you pick?
- You store very many small files and want O(1) disk lookups
- You need POSIX mounts (FUSE) or WebDAV next to the S3 API
- You want to choose the metadata store: RocksDB, PostgreSQL or FoundationDB
- Your nodes are spread across sites or homes and some will go offline
- You want a single Rust binary with embedded metadata (LMDB, SQLite or Fjall)
- AGPL-3.0 is acceptable for your use
- You already run it and need to understand the architecture you depend on
- You rely on its Reed-Solomon erasure coding, etcd-backed IAM or tiering, and accept that the repository is archived
Side by side
| Attribute | SeaweedFS | Garage | MinIO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Written in | GoRust | Rust | Go |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Frontend | none | none | none |
| Backend & APIs | GoRust | Rustgarage_net | GoErasure coding (Reed-Solomon)etcdLDAPOpenID Connect |
| Data & persistence | S3RocksDB | LMDBSQLiteFjall | S3Azure Blob StorageGoogle Cloud StorageEvent notification targets |
| Infrastructure & deploy | DockerKubernetes | DockerNixKubernetesPrometheusWoodpecker CI | DockerKubernetesPrometheus |
| Key decisions |
|
|
|
| Audited | 66f1754 · 2026-09-17 | d50be27 · 2026-09-17 | 7aac2a2 · 2026-09-17 |
How they differ
Where the metadata lives
The biggest architectural split is metadata. SeaweedFS follows Facebook’s Haystack design: masters (coordinated with Raft) hand out file ids, volume servers append “needles” into large volume files and keep an in-memory index, and a separate Filer maps paths to needles in a pluggable store. Garage keeps metadata in tables replicated across the cluster by its own RPC layer, stored in an embedded engine. MinIO writes objects with Reed-Solomon erasure coding and can keep IAM and configuration in etcd.
Failure model
Garage is designed for small-to-medium clusters where nodes are expected to fail or sit in different locations, and its correctness is tested with fuzzing and Jepsen. SeaweedFS offers erasure coding for cold volumes (8 data + 4 parity shards) and a Rust volume engine for low-overhead disk I/O. MinIO’s redundancy is application-level erasure coding rather than RAID.
Interfaces and licensing
SeaweedFS exposes S3, FUSE mounts, WebDAV and Hadoop-compatible access from one weed binary and is Apache-2.0. Garage offers S3 plus its own K2V key-value API and static website hosting, under AGPL-3.0. MinIO is AGPL-3.0 and, in the audited repository, archived.
Architecture diagrams
Frequently asked questions
Is MinIO still maintained?
The audited MinIO repository is archived and carries an explicit deprecation notice, so new deployments should weigh that against SeaweedFS (Apache-2.0) or Garage (AGPL-3.0), which are both active.
Which is written in Rust: SeaweedFS, Garage or MinIO?
Garage is written entirely in Rust. SeaweedFS is written in Go with a Rust re-implementation of its volume server, and MinIO is written in Go.
Do SeaweedFS, Garage and MinIO need an external database?
Garage embeds its metadata store (LMDB, SQLite or Fjall). SeaweedFS keeps file metadata in a pluggable Filer store such as RocksDB, PostgreSQL or FoundationDB. MinIO stores objects with application-level erasure coding and can distribute IAM and config state through etcd.
More architecture comparisons
View allRustFS vs Garage
RustFS vs Garage compared on architecture: two Rust S3 object stores, erasure coding vs replication, metadata, protocols, licensing and deployment.
SeaweedFS vs RustFS
SeaweedFS vs RustFS compared on architecture: Haystack-style volumes and a Filer vs erasure-coded object storage, Go vs Rust, protocols and licensing.
AFFiNE vs AppFlowy
AFFiNE vs AppFlowy compared on architecture: React + Yjs vs Flutter + Rust, local-first storage, sync servers, native code and local AI.
Appsmith vs ToolJet vs Budibase
Appsmith, ToolJet and Budibase compared on architecture: Java vs NestJS vs Koa, MongoDB vs PostgreSQL vs CouchDB, sandboxing, plugins and deployment.